Journal of Religion and the Contemporary World

Journal of Religion and the Contemporary World

Anthropomorphic and Disanthropomorphic Models in Explaining Revelation and Their Relationship with each other

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Assistant Professor, Department of Theology, Mofid University, Qom, Iran.
Abstract
Based on the two ideas of anthropomorphism and negative theology, in the explanation of revelation, one can speak of two models. According to the anthropomorphistic model, God is a being like a human being who chooses a person and conveys his message to him through speech; but according to the negative theology model, God is superior to having a relationship with humans, but it is humans who reach out to a supernatural world and bring informations from there. Although the anthropomorphistic model of explaining revelation is more consistent with the appearances of religious texts, it is not consistent with philosophical theology and some other religious texts. This is while the explanation of revelation based on negative theology model is consistent with philosophical theology; but it is significantly distant from the appearances of religious texts. However, it is possible to provide an explanation of revelation that does not suffer from the problems of either of the two ideal explanations of anthropomorphism and negative theology. This explanation is based on the theology that is proposed in the mysticism of Ibn Arabi and those like him by drawing a middle path between anthropomorphism and negative theology. Also, by accepting the theory of panentheism as opposed to the two viewpoints of pantheism and personal God, the explanation of revelation will have a smoother path.
Keywords

Subjects


Bibliography
Aristotle. Metaphysics. Translated by Sharafoddin Khorasani. Tehran: Hikmat, 4th Ed, 2006. [In Persian]
Barbour, Ian G. Issues in Science and Religion. Translated by Bahaoddin Khorramshahi. Tehran: Nashre Daneshgahi, 7th Ed, 2010. [In Persian]
Fakhre Razi, Mohammad Ibn Omar. Mafatih Al-Ghayb. Bairot: Darol-Ihya-Altorath-Alaragbi, 1999. [In Persian]
Ghoonavi, Sadroddin. Al-Nosoos. Tehran: Nashre Daneshgahi, 1992. [In Persian]
Gita (Bahagavad Gita): Soroode Khodayan. Translated by Mohammad Ali Movahhed. Tehran: Kharazmi, 1995. [In Persian]
Ibne-Arabi, Mohyi-addin. Al-Fotoohat-Al-Makkiah. Edited by Osman Yahya, Bairot: Darol-Ihya-Altorath-Alaragbiah, 1994. [In Persian]
Ibne-Arabi, Mohyi-addin. Fosoos-Alhikam. Cairo: Darol-Ihya-Alkotob-Alarabiah, 1946. [In Persian]
Ibrahimi Dinani, Gholamhossein. Ghavaede Kollie Falsafi Dar Falsafe Eslami, Tehran: Moassese Motaleat Va Tahghighate Farhagi, 1993. [In Persian]
Jandi, Moayyed Al-din. Sharhe Al-Fotoohat-Al-Makkiah. Ghom: Boostane Ketab, 2th Publication, 2002. [In Persian]
Khomeyni, Roohollah. Misbah Alhedayah Ila-Al-Khilafah Va Al-Velayah. Tehran: Moassese Tanzim Va Nashre Asare Emam Khomeini, 3th Publication, 1997. [In Persian]
Khomeyni, Roohollah. Shifeye Emam. Tehran: Moassese Tanzim Va Nashre Asare Emam Khomeini, 3th Publication, 2000. [In Persian]
Krik, G.S., J.E. Raven, and M. Schofield. The Presocratic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Motahhari, Mortaza. Majmooe Asar. Vol. 4. (Nabovvat). Tehran: Sadra, 1993. [In Persian]
Panikkar, Raimundo. “Deity.” In The Encyclopedia of Religion, Edited by Eliade, Mircea. New York and London: Macmillan, 1987.
Soroosh, Abdolkarim. Kalame Mohammad, Royaye Mohammad. Nashre Soghrat, 2018. [In Persian]
Termezi, Mohammad Ibn Isa. Al-Jami Al-Sahih. (Sonan). Cairo: Dar-Alhadith, 1998. [In Persian]
Yandell, Keith E. “Pantheism.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of philosophy. vol. 7. London and New York: Routledge, 1998.
Zwi Werblowsky, R. J. “Anthropopathism.” In The Encyclopedia of Religion. Edited by Eliade, Mircea. New York and London: Macmillan, 1987.
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.