Journal of Religion and the Contemporary World

Journal of Religion and the Contemporary World

Reinterpreting Qur'anic Verses on Zakat Recipients: A Gadamerian Hermeneutical Analysis of Muhammad Shahrur's Perspective

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Associate Professor, Department of Quranic Studies and Hadith, Faculty of Theology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Post-doctorate researcher, Department of Quranic Studies and Hadith, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
According to Hans-Georg Gadamer's hermeneutics, human understanding is constantly molded by historical influences. Similarly, Muhammad Shahrur, a modern Syrian intellectual, reinterprets Islamic teachings by considering the historical context in the interpretation of religious texts. Thus, this article adopts a descriptive-analytical approach, utilizing the literature on Gadamerian hermeneutics, to examine Shahrur's ideas regarding the categorization of zakat recipients based on his interpretation of verse 60 of Surah At-Tawbah. The findings indicate that Shahrur challenges traditional Islamic jurists' perspectives on zakat recipients and identifies four categories of deserving individuals: the poor, the destitute, the indebted, and the wayfarers or travelers in need. Through a scientific-historical approach, he expands the definition of 'poor' to include orphans, broadens the category of 'destitute' to encompass individuals with special needs, incorporates those obligated to pay blood money for wrongful killings under the 'indebted' category, and refers to those who suffer losses during their travels as 'wayfarers'. Shahrur's interpretation is influenced by his scientific-historical approach, which is significantly shaped by the prevailing intellectual framework of Moscow, particularly Russian structuralism. Additionally, his linguistic professor, Jafar Dak al-Bab, also impacted his intellectual development.
Keywords

Subjects


Bibliography 
Ahmadi, Babak. The text- structure and textural interpretation. Tehran, Nashre Markaz, 2001. [In Persian]
Alavi Moqaddam. Mehyar. Contemporary Theories of Literary Criticism: Formalism and Dtructuralism. Tehran: Samt, 2002. [In Persian]
 Arab Salehi, Mohammad. Understanding in the trap of historicism; Gadamer and the historicity of understanding. Tehran: Publishing Organization of Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought, 2019. [In Persian]
 Arabsalehi. Mohammad. Historicism and religion. Tehran: Publishing Organization of Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought, 2012. [In Persian]
Christmann, Andreas. “The Form Is Permanent, but the Content Moves: The Qur’anic Text and Its Interpretation(s) in Mohamad Shahrour’s Al-Kitab Wa ‘l Qur’an.” Die Welt des Islams 43, no. 2 (2003): 143-172.
Christmann, Andreas. The Qur’an, Morality and Critical Reason. Leiden: Brill, 2009.
Culler, Jonathan. Ferdinand de Saussure. Translated by Korosh Safavi Tehran, Hermes publication, 2000. [In Persian]
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method, Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum, 1994.
 Harland, Richard. Literary theory from Plato to Barthes: an introductory history. Translated by Ali Masoumi and Shapour Jourkesh, Tehran: Cheshmeh Publications, 2014. [In Persian]
Hirsch, Eric Donald. Validity in Interpretation. New Haven and London, United States of America: Yale University Press, 1967.
Ibn al-Anbārī, ʻAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Muḥammad. Nuzhat al-albāʼ fī Ṭabaqāt al-Udabāʼ. Baghdād: Maṭbaʻat al-Maʻārif, 1959. [In Persian]
Ibn faris, Ahmad. Mu'jam maqayis al-lughah. Research by Abd al-Salam Haroun, Qom: Maktab al-Alam al-Islami, 1983. [In Persian]
 Jurjani, Abd Alqahir. Dalail ul-E’jaz. Beirut: Dar Al-Kitab Al-Arabi. 1997. [In Persian]
Kalle, Puolakka. Reconsidering Relativism and Intentionalism in Interpretation. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 2009.
 Makaryk, Irena Rima. Encyclopedia of contemporary literary theory. Translated by Mehran Mohajer and Mohammad Nabavi, Tehran: agah publication, 2014. [In Persian]
 Mo’tamed Langrudi, Fereshteh, and Fathiyeh Fattahizadeh. “An Appraisal of Muhammad Shahrur’s Viewpoint on the Principles of Comprehension and Interpretation of the Holy Qur’an”, Qur'anic Researches 25, no. 94, (Spring 2020): 45-66. [In Persian]
Mustaqim, Abdul. Epistemologi Tafsir Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: LKis, 2010.
 Nejati, Gholamreza. Six day war between Arabs and Israel. Tehran: Nasser Khosrow, 1968. [In Persian]
 Qurtubi, Muhammad bin Ahmad. Al-Jamae for the Ahkam of the Qur'an (Tafsir al-Qurtubi). Tehran, Nasser Khosrow Publications, 1985. [In Persian]
Ragheb Esfahani, Hussein Ibn Muhammad. Al-Mofradaat. 1st Edition, Beirut: Dar Al-Qalam, 1991. [In Persian]
 Saleh, Sobhi. Dirasat fi fiqh al-lughah. Beirut: Dar El Ilm Lilmalayin, 1960. [In Persian]
Shahrour, Muhammad. AI-Kitab wa 'l-Qur 'an: Qira 'a Mu 'asira. Damascus: Al-Ahali Lal-Taba'ah wa Al-Nashar wa Al-Tawzi'a, 2006. [In Persian]
Tabari, Muhamad bin Jarir. Jaamie‟ al-Bayan fi Tafsir al-Qur‟an. Beirut: Dar al-Ma‟arifat, 1991. [In Persian]
Tabatabayi, Mohammad Hossein. Al-Mizan fi Tafsir al-Qur'an. Qom: Society of Teachers of Qom Theological Seminary, Islamic Publications Office, 1996. [In Persian]
 Vaezi, Ahmad. An Introducion to Hermeneutic. Tehran: Publishing Organization of Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought, 2005. [In Persian]
Weberman, David. "A New Defense of Gadamer's Hermeneutics." Philosophy and Phenomenological Review 60, no.1 (January 2000): 45-65.
Zuḥailī, Wahba. Al-Tafsir al-Munir fi al-Aqidah wa-al-Shari ah wa-al-Manhaj. Beirut:  Dar Al-Fikr Al-Mouaser, 1997. [In Persian]
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.